"Al Nasr Coalition" rejects the term of "constitutional balance" that came in Article (6) of the Federal Supreme Court Law, and considers it a dangerous precedent by introducing terms that do not have the constitutional and legal basis, and it legalizes ethno-sectarian quotas in the structure of the state and in the judiciary in particular.

"Al Nasr Coalition" confirms that the term (balance) was mentioned once constitutionally in relation to the armed forces, and no party, including Parliament, has the right to tamper with the constitution.

Al Nasr demands reconsideration of Article (6) of the amended Federal Court Law as it should be consistent with the Iraqi constitution in force.